When I first got the car I was unable to really drive it because of the ergonomics. I bought the ND1 model which does not have a telescoping steering wheel like the newer model. I found the seating position almost unbearable, but luckily the ND2 steering assembly swaps right over. It was about $300 in parts from Mazda and an hour of work. I highly recommend this upgrade for any ND1 owners.
It took a little while to get used to the Miata as well coming from the other two. The shift knob is so small from the factory it feels like you’re pinching salt and needed to be replaced immediately before being able to judge it fully. Funny enough, the shifter that I used to complain about in the FR-S was something I found myself missing!
In daily form this car truly shines. It is by far the most comfortable of all three cars and gets an absurd (awesome) 35MPG on the highway. The clutch and brake pedal is also the best of the three. I’m not a fan of the throttle pedal rotating from the bottom, but I’ve learned to get used to it.
DAILY DRIVER (HARDTOP)
Since two of these cars are convertibles, I am going to compare them if you are going to opt for a hardtop or RF ND. I feel like going for the hardtop takes away a lot of the charm from both the S2000 and ND. They are both cars of two personalities. If you are not a fan of convertibles, I think the FR-S is the best of the three. Even with a hardtop the FR-S is much quieter and has a lot more space. I personally am not a fan of the S2000 with a hardtop. If it did not come as a convertible, I would not have bought the car. I have also driven a RF ND and it is more of a t-top rather than a full convertible. It did not give me the same sensation that the soft-top models do. When I was shopping for the car, I did not have any interest in the RF version.
The FR-S is a great daily not only because of being a coupe, but it is the most well-rounded. I had no problems doing Home Depot runs in the car and never had to borrow a friend’s car. The S2000 is pretty much only good for grocery shopping and the Miata has even less room than the S2000. The benefit of the back seats does give a lot more storage and convenience as well, especially for a student. They’re not very good for putting people back there, but great for a backpack or other equipment.
It might matter to some, but the FR-S is also the best choice if you have to fit a child seat. I don’t think I would ever fit one in the ND or 06+ S2000, even if they are able to turn off the passenger airbag.
I would rank this FR-S > ND > S2000
DAILY DRIVER (SOFT-TOP)
I am going to exclude the FR-S here since it does not have a convertible option. If your mind is set on having on of the convertibles as a daily, I would recommend the Miata. It is much more comfortable, gets much better MPG, and is the most fun driving around town. The low-end torque and the gearing is much better than the S2000 so it genuinely feels faster around town. The ergonomics are also better for daily driving since it has the option of the telescoping steering wheel. The AP2 does have better gearing than the AP1, but it still doesn’t come close to the ND in terms of daily torque. I am also a driver that rarely touches VTEC going around town so I don’t think I get the full benefits of the S2000 around town.
Also, the manual soft-top of the ND is actually much better than the electronic S2000. I could have the top up or down in the ND in about 2 seconds. This might be an issue if you’re up there in age, but I would much prefer if the S2000 did it the same way. If I am cruising down the street at 30MPH and it stops raining, I just go ahead and put the top down with one hand without having to wait for a stop. It also has one center latch, rather than two of the S2000.
With the ND being a much newer car is also has a lot of creature comforts the S2000 lacks in. One of my killer applications is having keyless entry and the S2000 has a whole sequence just to turn it on. Having NAV and Android Auto/CarPlay support is pretty big for me as well.
I would rank this ND > S2000
DAILY DRIVER/WEEKEND WARRIOR
I remember Speed Academy being asked this question between their FR-S and S2000 and not agreeing with them picking the FR-S. However, now I agree that is the better choice. It is a huge benefit to be able to have track wheels and tires in the car. Not only that, but you don’t have to worry about cutting up the interior for a roll bar or passing broomstick tests. The drive to and from the track is also much better in the FR-S than the other two. Driving to the track in the S2000 felt like a chore whereas in the FR-S it was comfortable and easy. Another thing to mention is the FR-S comes with much better stock seats than the S2000 and ND does. I did not feel the need to upgrade those to a bucket, but in the other two it’s kind of a must if you don’t want to be sliding around.
I don’t feel like the ND makes a good track car in stock form. It is very soft, which makes it great for a daily, but it doesn’t translate well on track. I think it needs a few more mods than the other two to make it more fun on track but they would heavily compromise the car as a daily driver.
I would rank this FR-S > S2000 > ND
TRACK ONLY CAR
This is where the S2000 shines, but the FR-S comes a close second for me. I actually think the FR-S has a higher ceiling because of the aero and coupe benefits, but just lacks in the power department. The S2000 is just such a gem in terms of performance. As you probably already know, there is nothing like a 9000RPM redline and the neutrality of the S2000. It is the hardest to drive of the three, but also the most rewarding.
The FR-S might be a better choice for beginners because it is much easier to drive at the limit. I don’t see enough reviewers talk about this but I think the car has way too much understeer and I had to purposely tune the car to get it to rotate. The benefit is it’s pretty much impossible to screw up in and rarely makes you feel like you’re in a dangerous situation.
As I mentioned a little bit earlier, the ND needs more work than the others to make it track capable. A set of Ohlins and stiffening up the car would transform it into another animal. I think a well prepped ND would absolutely spank the other two because of it’s underbody aero benefits and light weight.
I am assuming a track only car has a truck/trailer even though I didn’t. If you have to drive to the track like I did, get the FR-S.
I am really torn between the two cars here because the S2000 is more fun as a track car, but the FR-S is so much more economical and practical as a track car.
I would rank this S2000 > FR-S > ND
PARTS AND MODDING COMMUNITY
I felt this topic should be taken into account as well. A good community means a lot to me and greatly impacts the ownership experience. Back when I first got the S2000 the online community was at it’s infancy and only similarly minded people owned it. Once the car got cheaper is when the community exploded. There used to be only a few wheels options back in the day, but now there’s a ton!
As it stands now, the S2000 community is beginning to die down. Parts are becoming harder to find, especially longblocks. Expect to be about $4000 in the hole if you need an engine replacement.
The FR-S community is not as track oriented as the S2000 community is, but they are much more into modding. Stock parts are dirt cheap and plentiful. For example: a set of front headlights is $80 compared to $600 for the S2000. There are not as many FR-S track owners as there should be, but there is a lot of aftermarket support. This car is by far the cheapest to mod and fix if something happens.
As for the ND from my observations their owner base seems to be older than the other two. The modding and track community seems small right now, outside of STR autocross. The good news is they have a factory club car so there will always be a plethora of aftermarket support for the car. I think the price for parts right now is high, just as it was for the S2000 when there wasn’t a lot of competition.
FINAL THOUGHTS
In order to make a final decision I think it’s better to know what purpose the car will solve and then decide from there. Even though they are all similar cars, they really shine in different ways. The S2000 will always have a special place in my heart so it is my favorite of the three, but I have to acknowledge it’s getting up there in age and doesn’t make a lot of sense anymore.
If I had to start over today I would wait and see how the Gen2 BRZ/FR-S turns out. If they solve the speed issue it has the chance to blow the other two out of the water in terms of performance. It will not have the convertible aspect to it, but I have a feeling it’s going to be a truly great car.
I hope this was helpful and/or insightful. There are a lot of difference factors involved so if you feel I missed something or want my opinion on anything else feel free to comment below and I will update my post!
Thanks everyone and happy car shopping.